top of page

FA 24 General Meeting Log

SOS Discussion

Our club, SOS, conducted five presentations and discussions in the FA '24 semester, each deeply focused on one of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). After each presentation, members engaged in debates on related issues, ensuring everyone had a chance to present and contribute to sustainability efforts while learning together.

SOS Discussion Topics

SDG 17 :

SOS held its first regular club meeting on September 24th, focusing on UN SDG 17: 'Partnerships for the Goals.' We discussed the impact of global cooperation on goal achievement, examining both positive and negative aspects through case studies. The discussion centered on whether countries should prioritize global challenges over national interests. The conclusion emphasized the need for collaboration between developed and developing countries, supported by strong governmental frameworks for fair cooperation.


 

SDG 1 :

SOS held its second meeting, focusing on SDG 1: 'No Poverty.' The presentation covered post-pandemic poverty eradication policies and programs, highlighting international responses and the impact on vulnerable groups. The discussion centered on whether poverty is an individual's responsibility or a structural issue, concluding that society should provide opportunities for escaping poverty, which individuals must then use to their advantage. 

 

​

SDG 10 :

SOS completed its third meeting, focusing on SDG 10: 'Reduced Inequalities.' The presentation explored the impact of technology on inequality, discussing both the positive and negative effects of digital advancements, including the case of Kenya's M-Pesa, as well as the role of automation. The discussion topic was 'Does globalization exacerbate or alleviate inequality?' We concluded that globalization can foster economic growth and reduce poverty across nations, while also potentially deepening inequalities within countries.

 

​

SDG 5 :

SOS successfully concluded its fourth meeting, focusing on SDG 5: 'Gender Equality.' The presentation explored cases of abolishing gender discrimination laws and implementing gender equality legislation, highlighting the U.S. women's suffrage movement and Sweden's paid parental leave law.

​

The discussion topic was 'Does the gender ratio in leadership positions have a tangible impact on society?' Opinions were divided—some pointed to research from Norway showing companies with more female leaders experienced higher growth, suggesting a tangible impact of gender balance. Others argued that leadership should be based on individual ability rather than gender. The conclusion emphasized that while gender can shape social perceptions, fostering an inclusive dialogue is key as society's expectations of leadership evolve.

​​

​

SDG 3 :

SOS successfully completed its sixth meeting! The presentation focused on SDG 3: 'Good Health and Well-being,' with an in-depth exploration of the link between mental health issues and suicide, along with possible interventions. We also discussed mental health care systems in developing countries, highlighting insights from India as a key example.

SP 23 General Meeting Log

KakaoTalk_Photo_2023-04-29-01-39-43 001.jpeg
TOPIC 1 LIFE OF PI

Dudley and Stephens Case

Pros : Dudley and Stephens should not be charged as guilty because of cannibalism.

It is judged that viewing individuals rationally and personally in emergency situations that are directly related to their lives is meaningless. The behavior of survivors should be attributed to automatic reflexes. Rather than judging guilt based on reason, it is better to see this situation as a struggle for the survivors' lives. Since this situation is a special circumstance that only a very small number of people can experience, it will be difficult to make rational judgments.

Cons : Dudley and Stephens should be charged as guilty because of cannibalism.

The biggest problem is whether an actual act of murder has been committed. It is wrong for individuals to make a judgment that they will die anyway without the input of a doctor. At the very least, it is appropriate to determine guilt for the crime and impose punishment within reasonable limits, such as probation. Because there was at least one person who had rationality at the time, regardless of whether the perpetrator had rationality or not, they committed a crime and must be punished. The victim also has the right to live, and no one has the right to kill another person. Natural death and murder are different. It violates the right to survival of the person who is dying.

Past General Meetings

These are the example of topics we've covered in the general meetings. For more information, please visit our Instagram.

KakaoTalk_Photo_2022-11-10-03-14-11 010.jpeg
KakaoTalk_Photo_2022-11-10-03-18-37.jpeg
  • Instagram
KakaoTalk_Photo_2022-11-10-03-13-54 001.jpeg
KakaoTalk_Photo_2022-11-10-03-14-05 006.jpeg
KakaoTalk_Photo_2022-11-10-03-14-21 001.jpeg
KakaoTalk_Photo_2022-11-10-03-14-02 005.jpeg
KakaoTalk_Photo_2022-11-10-03-14-09 009.jpeg

Meetings Every
Week

Individuals should prepare two to three presentations each semester with teammates, and we all have 30 minutes discussion session after the presentation. We believe acknowledging the current events and 17 SDGs are essential for us to understand the vision and grow into future sustainable leaders. 

bottom of page